Saturday, May 09, 2015

Review: “The Day the World Turned Upside Down” by Thomas Olde Heuvelt, Lia Belt Translator

Review: “The Day the World Turned Upside Down” by Thomas Olde Heuvelt, Lia Belt Translator (Lightspeed Magazine, April 2014)

Spoilers. I'm going to discuss the beginning, middle and end. If you want to remain unspoiled, read it first.

This is a non-Sad Puppy nomination.  It's a translated work.

I'm not familiar with the original language and its idioms, but it reads exactly as if the writer's long term relationship broke up and he said to a friend, "My world has turned upside down!" and the friend replied, "She's not coming back. You have to let go," and he thought, "Hey, I can make a story out of those phrases!" Because that's it: He's lost his girl, the world turns upside down, and he's told he has to let go.

I've seen a few reviews of this one already, and they all mention that the protagonist of the story is a thoroughly unlikeable, self-centered git, and also that you can't keep a goldfish in soda pop when you run out of water. So take it as read that both of these things are true.

In the story, gravity reverses itself and no one knows why, but it's speculated that the Earth just got fed up. Many people died as they hit their ceilings; planes and satellites dropped away into space. Some things aren't quite as affected by the reversal which has led to some reviewers saying the story is inconsistent in its 'physics'. I say eeeehhhh so what.  In a world where gravity can turn upside down, physics has pretty much had it anyway. Also, I remember reading a story a long, long time ago, probably in Fantasy & Science Fiction in the 60's, where gravity reversed for just one person. His neighbors watch dumbfounded as he clutches at a tree screaming that it would be such a long way to fall. They try to pry him away from the tree, and he loses his grip, eventually falling up and away with his hands still clutching twigs and leaves, dwindling into the sky. I can't remember the author or the title, but the story stuck with me for fifty years, so I'll give another one of its ilk a chance.

In summary, the protagonist's girlfriend has broken off their relationship, and boy is he pissed. He's not a nice man and isn't very polite about it. She says she's coming to pick up her goldfish the next day, but by the time next day rolls around, everything's upside down. The man saves the goldfish, letting a nearby woman fall to her presumed death as he does so, and sets off, hand over hand on anything that will tether him, to get the fish back to his ex.  On the way, he meets two old ladies with saints' names who are spinning flax – which I think is a clue that we're not in the world of physics, but fairy tales here – and they tell him to let go. They themselves are planning to join the "falling stars" – people who have fallen off the earth.  He finds his ex – she's injured, and he learns she had a new boyfriend. Had – he died in the reversal. She doesn't want our man back, even though he's gone through hell to bring her the goldfish, and he throws a jealous fit. He's still not a nice man. He finally does let go – he lets Bubbles the fish go free in a lake, and realizes as he looks up at his reflection in the water that the world *is* the right way up. He's just looking at it the wrong way round. He goes back to the old ladies' now-empty place and climbs down their flaxen thread, into the sky.

This is a lovely story and is rich with metaphorical language and evocative descriptions, for which we can surely thank both the writer and the translator.

Sample quote: "Scientists lucky enough to survive the event said that it wasn’t so much that gravity had disappeared, but that it had flipped over, as if our planet had suddenly lost all of its mass and was surrounded by some colossal object. Religious people, unlucky enough to survive the miracle, said that life was give and take, and that God was now, after so many years of giving, finally taking. But there was no colossal object, and being taken by God is a dubious given."

It's a shame our man is such a shit but it takes all kinds. It's worth reading, maybe even worth a Hugo. We'll see how the others shake out.

Review: “Ashes to Ashes, Dust to Dust, Earth to Alluvium” by Gray Rinehart

Review: “Ashes to Ashes, Dust to Dust, Earth to Alluvium” by Gray Rinehart (Orson Scott Cards InterGalactic Medicine Show, May 2014) SP 

A Sad Puppy, but not Rabid Puppy, nominee, AADDEA is the first Gray Rinehart story I've read.

Warning: There will be spoilers. Go read it first if you don't want to be spoiled.

The hardest part of this story to get through is the beginning, where the author describes going through a door into a roofless building. Rooflessness will become important later, but the aliens' door is only discussed once and I've literally spent an hour trying to work out how it must look.

"The door leading to the Tephrist's studio reminded Cerna of a clam's shell turned on its side, except it was grossly oversized, indigo-painted, and steel. […] As the door-halves swung apart on smooth tracks, Cerna resisted the urge to pull his friend away. The interlocking flutes were sharp edged and equipped with heavy-duty pins as long as his forearm that secured it in the off-hours."

Which part of a clam shell is its "side"? I think of them as sitting with their hinge on the sea floor, fluted jaws upwards so as to be able to grab frogmen by their flippers in 60's sci-fi shows, but I'm willing to contemplate that they could lie on one half of their shell, with the top half lifting upwards, as in the plastic bubbling clam shells you get for amusement in 20 gallon aquariums.  Assuming in either case that the bit that is on the bottom is the foot, which bit is its side? I can't visualize what a clam's "side" must be.

And the sentence "The interlocking flutes were sharp edged and equipped with heavy-duty pins as long as his forearm that secured it in the off-hours" boggled my mind. I guess the sudden appearance of an "it" must refer back to the singular door in the first sentence of the story, not "his forearm" which is the only singular thing in the sentence. I imagined it - the door- must be like the pods that revealed the band members in Spinal Tap (except for the luckless Derek Smalls), although I would say those clam shells were on their ends rather than their sides. But I couldn't make that image work. There's a room behind the door. How does a clam shell in any direction open to reveal a room behind it? I think it would have helped if Rinehart or his editor had gone over this description to fine tune it a little. Or a lot.

Anyway, letting that go, our heroes get into the room behind the door where they see:
"The ceiling was mostly open to the afternoon sky, typical of Peshari construction, but buttresses rose from the corners that were interconnected with steel bars."
Now – spoiler – the aliens, the Peshari, are afraid of things that might fall and bury them. This is the major plot point. I can see why the writer would want to stress their buildings have buttresses early in the story. I can't see, however, why the buttresses would be on the inside. They normally go on the outside of a building in order to hold the wall against the outward push of high or heavy ceilings, which this building doesn't even have.

And let's not get started on "but buttresses" which sounds like an Eminem mid-song ad-lib and now that it's stuck in my mind I keep blurting it out loud.

And once again, I'm not readily visualizing where the steel bars are supposed to fit in. 

The rest of the early descriptions don't get much clearer. 
"A few bricks were adorned with dead Peshari in miniature bas-relief."
'Adorn' doesn't just mean decorate, or ornament. It has a subtle hint of 'to make beautiful' which jars with the adjacent use of "dead Peshari".  And anyway, they aren't actual dead Peshari, they are sculptures of Peshari who have died, one per brick. "Bas-relief" eventually makes that clear but reading the words in the order they were written made me think of a Peshari Kali, adorned with a necklace of dead Peshari heads.

A couple of paragraphs later, Peshari is spelled "Pehsari".  Whoever edited this isn't getting my vote for Hugo best short-form editor, that's for sure.

After this it settles down a bit. The humans are part of a colony which was invaded a few years after its founding by the alien Peshari. The aliens are allowing the humans to live, barely, but are clamping down, year by year, on what tech the humans are allowed to use. There is an interesting and well-written middle describing the colonists, their lives in what amounts to a concentration camp, and their plans. The older man in the initial scenes is dying, since his access to medicine has been rescinded by the aliens. He went to the "Tephrist's Studio" to ask the Tephrist to make him one of those memorial bricks. But he does not want his cremains baked into the brick, as Peshari do. He wants what we later realize is a headstone. He does not tell the Tephrist this, but he wants to be buried, with a grave-marker.

He dies; he is buried. The aliens are so horrified that a supposedly sapient species can bear to be below a covering, especially of dirt, that it throws their whole human-management system into disarray. The story fades away at this point. The humans are gearing up to rebel, but they are going to do it after the story ends, and what part this confusion and repulsion in the minds of the Peshari plays in the rebellion, we never learn.  The last scene also makes it clear that the dying human took his own life near the end by an overdose of pain meds, but whether that engenders a John C Wright-level of revulsion on the narrator's part, I can't tell. 

Not being a co-religionist with a puppy is hard. What the doctor-assisted suicide of a dying man means to another colonist, we don't learn and I can't intuit. In addition, the narrator stresses:
"Phil told me he wanted to claim a plot of land all his own. And he believed in the resurrection of the body. I took that to mean that he wanted his body to inhabit his plot of land."
Is the aliens' reaction to the burial intensified because the man is not dead, but sleeping? I can see why that might horrify them, since they have that primal fear of enclosed spaces. Or are they terrified that when he wakes up he will fight them? It's hard to tell whether it's the misunderstanding of the Christian message(s) or something else that's bugging them.

Add that to the poor editing, the confusing descriptions, and the buried-lede rebellion, and this one doesn't rise to Hugo-worthy in my opinion, puppy or no puppy.



Uh,wrong: Chipotle can’t get rid of GMOs unless it stops selling corn

Quartz says,

In brief: maize has a hard time seeding itself naturally, so humans must have GENETICALLY ENGINEERED corn.

No.

This line of "We've been genetically modifying organisms for thousands of years... [implication that we know what we're doing and it's 100% safe goes here]" annoys the living fuck out of me.

Getting teosinte to become maize is very clever, but it isn't cutting genes out of other plants and inserting them into corn. It's not 'genetic engineering' any more than getting a wolf to become a chihuahua is genetic engineering. It's impressive, certainly, but it's not gene manipulation.

So maize had a hard time breeding without humans. Here's another example of a plant with breeding difficulties similar to maize: Avocados have huge seeds and tasty flesh. They used to be spread by South American megafauna - giant tree sloths, mammoths and gompotheres. These animals were large enough to eat avocados whole and defecate the seed well away from the parent tree. When the megafauna went extinct 13,000 years ago, avocado seeds had to germinate in the shadow of their parent trees. They must have struggled, but they hung on long enough that Homo sapiens began to breed them for fleshier and more edible (to us) fruit.

How avocado (and similar large-seeded fruits like cherimoya and papaya) survived is a bit of a mystery mixed with a lot of luck. Our ancestors picked the seeds they wanted and let the rest die. But this isn't "genetic engineering". It's just gardening.

I'm not saying genetically engineered food is harmful - obviously it isn't, so far - but making claims it can't be harmful because we've been doing this for thousands of years is dishonest. A lie. 

Did dad send cheek-swab DNA to an ancestry firm? Read this.

Remember when we used to say, "One day, the police will use genetic information to track people down. They could even use the guy's dad's genetic information," and people used to say, "Ha ha, you Sci-Fi fans. You need to spend some time in the real world not with all that escapist bullshit!"

And then later they said, "I'm going to send a sample to that gene-e-o-logical firm because Nate Blumenthal from accounts payable found out he was 3.76% Native American and that would be totes cool," or words to that effect.

The cops chose to use a lab linked to a private collection of genetic genealogical data called the Sorenson Database (now owned by Ancestry.com), which claims it’s “the foremost collection of genetic genealogy data in the world.” The reason the Sorenson Database can make such an audacious claim is because it has obtained its more than 100,000 DNA samples and documented multi-generational family histories from “volunteers in more than 100 countries around the world.” Some of these volunteers were encouraged by the Mormon Churchwell-known for its interest in genealogy—to provide their genetic material to the database. Sorenson promised volunteers their genetic data would only be used for “genealogical services, including the determination of family migration patterns and geographic origins” and would not be shared outside Sorenson.
[...]

They called up Usry, told him they were investigating a hit-and-run, and asked him to meet with them. Usry thought he “had nothing to hide” and agreed to the meeting. They took him to an interrogation room, questioned him without a lawyer present, and eventually collected a DNA sample. Then Usry sat on pins & needles for a month waiting for the results.
When the results came in, it turned out Usry’s DNA didn’t match the crime scene sample—despite the close familial markers and other circumstantial evidence, he wasn’t the murderer.

Friday, May 08, 2015

Hugo Voting is open - where to find the noms and the Sad Puppy and Rabid Puppy slate.

The good news: The Hugo voting is open, and there's a lot to read. The bad news: The Hugo voters' packet is not out yet and there's a lot to read.  

There doesn't seem to be a great deal of it out on the web, either.  Below is what I've found so far.  I'll probably have to buy The Goblin Emperor and The Three Body Problem soon if I'm going to read them in time to vote. I would buy the Ann Leckie, but I didn't read last year's Ancillary Justice, so I don't want to leap straight into Ancillary Sword. If it isn't in the voters' packet I'll have to reconsider whether to purchase both. Good for Analog making all their nominees available to everyone on the web.

I'll be reviewing what I read over the next few weeks here. There will be spoilers. 

In the list of nominations below, an SP after a name means it was on the Sad Puppy slate. An RP means it was on the Rabid Puppy slate. Underlined means it was not on either slate. A couple of works are withdrawn but still on the ballot, and those have been annotated as the nominees have said they don't want you to vote for them.

PLEASE CHECK MY WORK BEFORE VOTING. I would hate to label someone's nomination an SP and have a voter cast a vote for or against them on that basis only to find out later it was a typo. And I could have made any number of similar errors.

Here are the original listings so you can check for yourself:


Hugo finalists

If I've found them on the web, I've put the URL after their entry. The URL, the SP and the RP do not appear on the original text taken from the Sasquan site. Please check with your own sources that I'm correct before voting.

Best Novel 
  • Ancillary Sword by Ann Leckie (Orbit US; Orbit UK)
  • The Dark Between the Stars by Kevin J. Anderson (Tor Books) SPRP
  • The Goblin Emperor by Katherine Addison (Sarah Monette) (Tor Books)
  • The Three-Body Problem by Cixin Liu, translated by Ken Liu (Tor)
  • Skin Game by Jim Butcher (Roc Books) SPRP
Best Novella 
Best Novelette 
Best Short Story 
Best Related Work 
  • “The Hot Equations: Thermodynamics and Military SF” by Ken Burnside (Riding the Red Horse, Castalia House) SP
  • Letters from Gardner by Lou Antonelli (The Merry Blacksmith Press) SP
  • Transhuman and Subhuman: Essays on Science Fiction and Awful Truth by John C. Wright (Castalia House) SP
  • “Why Science is Never Settled” by Tedd Roberts (Baen.com) SP
  • Wisdom from My Internet by Michael Z. Williamson (Patriarchy Press) SP
Best Graphic Story 
  • Ms. Marvel Volume 1: No Normal written by G. Willow Wilson, illustrated by Adrian Alphona and Jake Wyatt (Marvel Comics)
  • Rat Queens Volume 1: Sass and Sorcery written by Kurtis J. Weibe, art by Roc Upchurch (Image Comics)
  • Saga Volume 3 written by Brian K. Vaughan, illustrated by Fiona Staples (Image Comics)
  • Sex Criminals Volume 1: One Weird Trick written by Matt Fraction, art by Chip Zdarsky (Image Comics)
  • The Zombie Nation Book #2: Reduce Reuse Reanimate by Carter Reid (The Zombie Nation) SPRP
Dramatic Presentation (Long Form) 
  • Captain America: The Winter Soldier screenplay by Christopher Markus & Stephen McFeely, concept and story by Ed Brubaker, directed by Anthony Russo and Joe Russo (Marvel Entertainment, Perception, Sony Pictures Imageworks)
  • Edge of Tomorrow screenplay by Christopher McQuarrie, Jez Butterworth, and John-Henry Butterworth, directed by Doug Liman (Village Roadshow Pictures, RatPac-Dune Entertainment, 3 Arts Entertainment; Viz Productions)
  • Guardians of the Galaxy written by James Gunn and Nicole Perlman, directed by James Gunn (Marvel Studios, Moving Picture Company) SP
  • Interstellar screenplay by Jonathan Nolan and Christopher Nolan, directed by Christopher Nolan (Paramount Pictures, Warner Bros. Pictures, Legendary Pictures, Lynda Obst Productions, Syncopy) SP
  • The Lego Movie written by Phil Lord & Christopher Miller, story by Dan Hageman, Kevin Hageman, Phil Lord & Christopher Miller, directed by Phil Lord & Christopher Miller (Warner Bros. Pictures, Village Roadshow Pictures, RatPac-Dune Entertainment, LEGO Systems A/S Vertigo Entertainment, Lin Pictures, Warner Bros. Animation (as Warner Animation Group)) SP
Dramatic Presentation (Short Form) 
  • Doctor Who: “Listen” written by Steven Moffat, directed by Douglas Mackinnon (BBC Television)
  • The Flash: “Pilot” teleplay by Andrew Kreisberg & Geoff Johns, story by Greg Berlanti, Andrew Kreisberg & Geoff Johns, directed by David Nutter (The CW) (Berlanti Productions, DC Entertainment, Warner Bros. Television) SPRP
  • Game of Thrones: “The Mountain and the Viper” written by David Benioff & D.B. Weiss, directed by Alex Graves (HBO Entertainment in association with Bighead, Littlehead; Television 360; Startling Television and Generator Productions)
  • Grimm: “Once We Were Gods”, written by Alan DiFiore, directed by Steven DePaul (NBC) (GK Productions, Hazy Mills Productions, Universal TV) SPRP
  • Orphan Black: “By Means Which Have Never Yet Been Tried” written by Graham Manson, directed by John Fawcett (Temple Street Productions; Space/BBC America)
Best Editor (Short Form) 
It's hard to evaluate editors unless you've read all the books they put out this year. If you haven't, Jim Hines has some thoughts here: http://www.jimchines.com/2015/05/hugo-thoughts-editors/
  • Jennifer Brozek SPRP
  • Vox Day RP
  • Mike Resnick SPRP
  • Edmund R. Schubert – WITHDRAWN BY EDITOR DO NOT VOTE
  • Bryan Thomas Schmidt SPRP
Best Editor (Long Form) 
It's hard to evaluate editors unless you've read all the books they put out this year. If you haven't, Jim Hines has some thoughts here: http://www.jimchines.com/2015/05/hugo-thoughts-editors/
  • Vox Day RP
  • Sheila Gilbert SPRP
  • Jim Minz SPRP
  • Anne Sowards SPRP
  • Toni Weisskopf SPRP
Best Professional Artist
  • Julie Dillon
  • Kirk DouPonce RP
  • Nick Greenwood SPRP
  • Alan Pollack SPRP
  • Carter Reid SPRP
Best Semiprozine 
  • Abyss & Apex Wendy Delmater editor and publisher SP
  • Andromeda Spaceways In-Flight Magazine Andromeda Spaceways Publishing Association Incorporated, 2014 editors David Kernot and Sue Burtsztynski SP
  • Beneath Ceaseless Skies edited by Scott H. Andrews
  • Lightspeed Magazine edited by John Joseph Adams, Stefan Rudnicki, Rich Horton, Wendy N. Wagner, and Christie Yant
  • Strange Horizons Niall Harrison Editor-in-Chief
Best Fanzine 
  • Black Gate edited by John O’Neill WITHDRAWN BY EDITOR DO NOT VOTE
  • Elitist Book Reviews edited by Steven Diamond SPRP
  • Journey Planet edited by James Bacon, Chris Garcia, Alissa McKersie, Colin Harris and Helen Montgomery
  • The Revenge of Hump Day edited by Tim Bolgeo SPRP
  • Tangent Online edited by Dave Truesdale SPRP
Best Fancast 
  • Adventures in SciFi Publishing Brent Bower (Executive Producer), Kristi Charish, Timothy C. Ward, Shaun Ferrell & Moses Siregar III (Co-Hosts, Interviewers and Producers) SPRP
  • Dungeon Crawlers Radio Daniel Swenson (Producer/Host), Travis Alexander & Scott SPRPTomlin (Hosts), Dale Newton (Host/Tech), Damien Swenson (Audio/Video Tech)
  • Galactic Suburbia Podcast, Alisa Krasnostein, Alexandra Pierce, Tansy Rayner Roberts (Presenters) and Andrew Finch (Producer)
  • The Sci Phi Show Jason Rennie SPRP
  • Tea and Jeopardy Emma Newman and Peter Newman
Best Fan Writer 
Best Fan Artist 
Fan artists are also hard to evaluate unless you already know a lot of their work. Some examples of their works are below, but I've no idea if this is representative of the work that got them nominated. I nicked this off of a helpful person on this GRRM message board.
The John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer 
Award for the best new professional science fiction or fantasy writer of 2013 or 2014, sponsored by Dell Magazines (not a Hugo Award).
  • Wesley Chu*
  • Jason Cordova SPRP
  • Kary English*SPRP
  • Rolf Nelson RP
  • Eric S. Raymond RP
*Finalists in their 2nd year of eligibility.



LinkWithin

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
I sometimes mention a product on this blog, and I give a URL to Amazon or similar sites. Just to reassure you, I don't get paid to advertise anything here and I don't get any money from your clicks. Everything I say here is because I feel like saying it.